On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> I vote a). No new function, gets rid of a stupid optimization that does no > one any good, and is the simplest. I also think (b) is becoming over-complicated. If someone knows their stencil and cares about memory usage, they can just pass the correct values. The defaults are terribly for anything but a 5-point stencil anyway. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130321/432a3137/attachment.html>
