Hi, I have been digging into the tutorials directories in PETSc and wanting to understand how the makefile breaks up fortran examples into TESTEXAMPLES_FORTRAN and TESTEXAMPLES_F90. (This is follow on work from the Tech-X Phase I related to PETSc.)
There appear to be some F90 examples that are mixed in TESTEXAMPLES_FORTRAN. For example, in the snes tutorials, I see this: snes/examples/tutorials/makefile:TESTEXAMPLES_FORTRAN = ex1f.PETSc runex1f ex1f.rm ex40f90.PETSc runex40f90 ex40f90.rm In other places, anything with an f90 in the name is under TESTEXAMPLES_F90. Is there any particular strategy for how files are placed under TESTEXAMPLES_FORTRAN and TESTEXAMPLES_F90? Another related question is that some of the F90 examples have a .F suffix and others have a .F90 suffix which is of course related to formatting but my guess is the committer of these files just following their own preferences. (See snes/examples/tutorials/ex39f90.F and ex40f90.F90.) Does anyone know if there was a reason that ex39f90 was made *.F and ex40f90 was make *.F90? I'm trying to parse some of these examples based on suffixes and different suffixes makes is a bit more cumbersome. Thanks for any help, Travis =============================== Travis Austin, Ph.D VP, Computational Mathematics Tech-X Corporation 5621 Arapahoe Ave Boulder, CO 80303 austin at txcorp.com =============================== -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20130416/4db9cc3a/attachment.html>
