On Jun 27, 2013, at 8:46 PM, "Timothy J. Tautges" <taut...@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> I've been mulling whether by default petsc should point to a release tarball > anyway, I think it should (4.6 being the latest). PETSc releases should point to moab releases. But PETSc-dev should point to moab-dev > > Any time you grab directly from git you can expect to have to run autoreconf, > since by policy we don't store configure file in the report. Do you have scripts/tools to run the "autoreconf" easily that we can call? Barry > > > - tim > > (Sent from an Androd that dosnt autocorect as wel as an ipone) > > > > -------- Original message -------- > Subject: Re: [petsc-dev] moab nightlybuild failure > From: Satish Balay <ba...@mcs.anl.gov> > To: Jed Brown <jedbr...@mcs.anl.gov> > CC: petsc-dev@mcs.anl.gov,taut...@mcs.anl.gov > > > > On Thu, 27 Jun 2013, Jed Brown wrote: > Satish Balay writes: > > > Ok - fixed > in 'balay/fix-moab-git'. Any comments? > > > > > https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/commits/1f16e75d68ca70d003ea3ef4dde0f67dcfe822d6 > > > Looks okay. What is the recommended way to _not_ try to use the Git > > version? Pass the URL directly? The current code is a bit of mess. For one - > I don't know why the GNUPackage requires URLs to be split up as such: >>>>> > self.downloadpath = 'http://ftp.mcs.anl.gov/pub/fathom/' self.downloadname = > 'moab' self.downloadfilename = 'moab' self.downloadversion = 'nightly' > self.downloadext = 'tar.gz' <<<< But ignoring this we currently have stuff > like the following - where the urls are attempted in the sequence specified. > If the first one fails - try the next one: >>>>> self.download = > ['https://elemental.googlecode.com/files/elemental-0.79-p1.tgz', > 'http://ftp.mcs.anl.gov/pub/petsc/externalpackages/elemental-0.79-p1.tgz'] > <<<<<< with [potential support] for multiple protocols. - as retrieval.py > lists: [we also support urls of type file://path] >>> # Fix parsing for > nonstandard schemes urlparse.uses_netloc.extend(['bk', 'ssh', 'svn']) <<<< > And currently this default can be overwriten by user with: > --download-package=url In this context we should not have a separate stuff > for git [self.giturls/self.gitcommit]. It should be rolled into the above > common url notation. [note: the current git code ignores user specified > --download-package=url - and just goes ahead and does the git stuff specified > in package.py] Somehow we have to add in 'prereqisites' to the 'repo' type > urls in the above scheme. And then perhaps retrieval.py can be asked to > ignore repo-urls with some option like '--url-git=no' Also - the repo urls > need better support wrt: 'getting updates & rebuilding package'. Current code > for this is tarball centric [with some bad behavior - like not detecting a > changed url etc..] Satish
