i.e - for bug fix updates - previously we used the notation:

petsc-3.3-p4

Now the new notation for the same is:

petsc-3.3.4

we switched from incrementing PETSC_VERSION_PATCH to incrementing 
PETSC_VERSION_SUBMINOR

Satish

On Wed, 31 Jul 2013, Barry Smith wrote:

> 
>    Toby,
> 
>     We've tried to come around to the "community standard" with the sub minor 
> numbering. It represents bug fixes from previous sub minors but NO API 
> changes. Users should be able to switch to a higher sub minor without any 
> changes to their code. 
> 
>     Barry
> 
> On Jul 31, 2013, at 6:03 AM, "Toby D. Young" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > I have been out of the loop for around-about-a-half-a-year by now, so
> > please forgive me while I catch up and get back on track.
> > 
> > What is the deal with PETSc's subminor version these days?
> > 
> > I recall a discussion ages ago, which I do not want to restart because I
> > do not care *that* much. I recall that subminor was for all purposes
> > dropped. (No?)
> > 
> > I recently updated petsc-dev to discover it has 3.4.2 version number.
> > Where did the "2" come from in petsc-dev and what does it mean to users?
> > I completely missed "0" and "1" somehow, but like I said, I've been out of
> > the loop...
> > 
> > Best regs,
> >     Toby
> > 
> > 
> > ------
> > 
> > Toby D. Young
> > Assistant Professor
> > 
> > Division of Computational Method
> > Institute of Fundamental Technological Research
> > of the Polish Academy of Sciences
> > ul Pawinskiego 5b
> > 02-106 Warsaw
> > Poland
> > 
> > www: http://www.ippt.pan.pl/~tyoung
> > 
> > Session on grid-based quantum many-body theory:
> > http://www.ippt.pan.pl/~tyoung/icnaam.html
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 

Reply via email to