Barry Smith <[email protected]> writes: > Generally there should be some non zeros in each row, we could > probably just use 2.0*a->nz - m
When using cprow, this should always be exact, right? If we are not using cprow because there weren't enough empty rows, but there are still some empty rows, it won't be exact, but it's likely not far off for typical matrices. It would be a shame, however, that we could now compute a negative number of flops. Should the check for cprow store the number of zero rows?
pgpWBKioIwiOS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
