Satish Balay <[email protected]> writes:
> I think the current approach is simpler..
>
> if !defined(PETSC_HAVE_STDINT_H) && defined(PETSC_HAVE___INT64)
> typedef __int64 .....

The PETSC_SIZEOF_ macros could be removed.  (We can probably remove most
or all of them now, but most of their uses would go away.)  Not a big
issue, but fewer tests in configure and fewer preprocessor clauses in
PETSc.

Attachment: pgpehAl4G1Pui.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to