What about a run-time option to enable it? What is the actual overhead for an application that calls MatSetValues with fine granularity? On Sep 11, 2013 6:13 AM, "Matthew Knepley" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The new CheckPointer() is 1000s of times slower than the previous. We may > want to have a configure option to disable it. > > I am not convinced, since the only function that it really matters for is > MatSetValues(), which is a problematic interface function. > > Matt > > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their > experiments lead. > -- Norbert Wiener >
