On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Jed Brown wrote: > > So how about just moving externalpackages into $PETSC_ARCH and > > don’t build some elaborate scheme that reuses tar balls for a tiny > > number of people. In other words a clean truly means clean and > > gets new tar balls. > > That sounds good to me.
I've attempted to move externalpackages into PETSC_ARCH. But I need to figureout how to do this for blaslapack.py & mpi.py - as they don't use the regular package.py stuff.. Matt - any ideas? The commits I have are: https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/commits/6169ffbf03ec9c2d2c66d78de2f75db3c481fc23?at=master https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/commits/315689470ef34fb0770466bd7f1fae35d41712f8?at=master BTW: would we still keep --with-externalpackages-dir option in this scheme? thanks, Satish
