On Thu, 7 Nov 2013, Blaise A Bourdin wrote: > I haven’t use fixed-form in a long time, but isn’t free-form a superset of > fixed-form?
In essence all current petsc code complies with this. [i.e its syntactically corect both free form and fixed form] > Are there situation where a fixed form code cannot be compiled as free form > source code? Not sure if its the fixed/free form issue - [its perhaps f77 vs f90] - some external packages use 'C' for comment - which some f90 compilers barf on. Satish
