Geoffrey Irving <[email protected]> writes: > It doesn't look like there's currently a way to pass user data down to > the various fields in PetscFEM. Can I add an extra argument to each > function, or is that part of the API going to change in a way that > would obviate the extra argument?
I want a completely different (higher level) API and I think I'll have time now that my proposal went in, but I think I asked Matt for a context parameter something like a year ago. I forget why he didn't want to add it.
pgp1Ev2yg4422.pgp
Description: PGP signature
