Barry Smith <[email protected]> writes: > Since it is not computable presumably it will not produce correct values.
Oh, presumably the compiler inserts initialization code just like happens when using a later standard. > The thing is if we start dropping this stuff in then we cannot use > the -std-c89 flag so we cannot consistently check for no c89 > constructs (or we get warnings all of the code that we cannot > distinguish from real warnings. > > It is a tiny bit of syntactic sugar that is not worth the > drawbacks of warnings and or not checking source code so please > don’t put it in. Sure, no problem, it's a minor convenience and I anticipate our language conservatism (caused by Microsoft) will continue for the near future. Registration of time integrator tableaus is a place that I recall getting similar warnings in the past, but where it is more annoying to list out as assignment statements.
pgpuBBgcuZy_V.pgp
Description: PGP signature
