Barry Smith <[email protected]> writes: > On Dec 19, 2013, at 1:52 PM, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> is there a good reason not to add rules for all the fortran stubs >> with the right dependencies, and call bfort individually? > > Can all the generated files also go in ${PETSC_ARCH} instead of > within the source code so that I can have different branches with > different arches and switch between them without having to > regenerate (and remove) the fortran stubs appropriate for that > particular arch — branch.
I would greatly prefer both of these, but I don't know how hard it is to add to bfort. I think the dependency rules are not complicated for the ftn-auto stubs, though f90 interfaces seem messy.
pgpnQ77nUsfCP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
