On Mon, 6 Jan 2014, Jed Brown wrote: > Satish Balay <[email protected]> writes: > > Hm - we use 06283fd4323cef45a7147b2226c8e0c084e2 notation for > > PETSC_VERSION_GIT in petscconf.h [via configure] and in petscversion.h > > [during tarball generation] > > > > Should these also be changed to the new notation? > > I think I suggested that a long time ago and would mildly prefer it now > too, though those uses have accompanying data that provides much of the > contextual information in git describe.
One can always derive the readable info from the full hash.. $ git describe 06283fd4323cef45a7147b2226c8e0c084e2 v3.4.3-2283-g06283fd For now I'll keep the full hash here. If it needs to be changed - all usages can be changed at the same time.. Satish
