On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:50 PM, Barry Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Matt,
>
> Ok, I took a look at that and see why I deleted it.
>
> I had hoped my new viewer with PetscLogView_Detailed() which can be
> accessed with -log_view :filename:ascii_info_detail could be used instead
> of PetscLogViewPython()
>
I like your new organization. I was trying to output in a format that did
not require us to write another parser. I will
reintegrate the code into your new setup.
Thanks,
Matt
> It, in theory, provides more information since it provides the values
> for each process so you can do any kind of cross process statistics you
> want. Or you can just add up the values from each process.
>
> Anyways, if you can't use it let me know and we can iterate on
> PetscLogView_Detailed() to make it useful.
>
> Barry
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2014, at 4:31 PM, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I was using that.
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > --
> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> experiments lead.
> > -- Norbert Wiener
>
>
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
