Eric Chamberland <[email protected]> writes: > I have a new question now : what would be the fastest way to do the > first assembly: with INSERT_VALUES or ADD_VALUES? Right now we are > doing ADD_VALUES but I imagine it have to hold all the "0" which will be > "added" later... maybe "INSERT_VALUES" will forget about overlapping > values??...
It makes no difference. > Anyway, the code I am rewriting now will hold all the non-zeros for > each "block" of similar lines... so I don't have overlapping > values... in sequential... but in parallel I think I will have > some... Anyway, any pros/cons between INSERT_VALUES or ADD_VALUES for > this first assembly?
pgpXzUXCYNOYz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
