"Jose E. Roman" <[email protected]> writes:

> Would it be too much asking that PetscSplitReduction be available in a
> public header? (together with the functions PetscSplitReductionGet,
> PetscSplitReductionEnd, PetscSplitReductionExtend).

Sounds reasonable to me.  Do you want to prepare a patch?  Otherwise I
can do it later today.

> I know this request comes too close to the release date.  Jose

Attachment: pgptoyQv3kQSL.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to