On 07/18/2014 09:51 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Dominic Meiser <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    I'm starting development of a bug fix in a new feature branch. The
    bug fix heavily relies on work in a different feature branch which
    is still a long ways away from getting merged into next or master.
    Which of the following approaches is the recommended practice:

    1) Branch off of master and merge the other feature branch I need
    into the newly create branch.
    2) Branch off of the other feature branch.
    3) Something else I'm not thinking of.


I do not really understand why you just do not make the fix in the feature branch?
To make things more specific, the bug fix is for DMDA's with cusp vectors. I think this will be a fair amount of work and it may take a while to complete. It needs work I've done in the dmeiser/fix-cusp-bjacobi branch but is otherwise unrelated. I thought it might be good to do it in a separate branch because of that. I wouldn't want work on this bug fix to hold up things with fix-cusp-bjacobi or to make that branch more difficult to review.

Cheers,
Dominic


   Matt

    Thanks.
    Dominic

-- Dominic Meiser
    Tech-X Corporation
    5621 Arapahoe Avenue
    Boulder, CO 80303
    USA
    Telephone: 303-996-2036 <tel:303-996-2036>
    Fax: 303-448-7756 <tel:303-448-7756>
    www.txcorp.com <http://www.txcorp.com>




--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener


--
Dominic Meiser
Tech-X Corporation
5621 Arapahoe Avenue
Boulder, CO 80303
USA
Telephone: 303-996-2036
Fax: 303-448-7756
www.txcorp.com

Reply via email to