Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> writes: >> Obviously everyone wants (1) and (3) to be automated - but we >> currently don't have that.. > > > I, of course, disagree. (1) is now automated in that you get a warning > if you try to merge next. That will help me. Please avert your eyes.
We have way bigger problems if people are skipping (1). Branches need to be reviewed before merging. Always. Why is this even being discussed? Having a warning to remind contributors sounds useful to me, but integrators should never be merging without reviewing.
pgpSjs4J_dLsa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
