On Thu, 4 Sep 2014, Jed Brown wrote: > > I'm suprised 'git branch' doesnt do the most obvious thing that one > > would expect. [default to - or have an option to list the current > > branch - not all the branches] > > Perhaps, but it wouldn't fix the problem because there isn't always a > "current branch". I would rather script with plumbing commands instead > of ones that could change output format.
Well its giving useful info burried in a big list. Why not just give that one line? Satish
