Barry Smith <[email protected]> writes: > Perhaps we erred in keeping the thread/task management/model code > in PETSc as opposed to a small portable library? We should revisit > this, but unfortunately cannot before next Wednesday :-), or can we > :-)
I was at the BLIS workshop yesterday and today discussing this with Field and a guy at Q-Chem. I think an independent library is desirable in the long term, but I don't think it's something that we can "win" in the sense of having everyone adopt our library. So we'll always need to interoperate with other systems.
pgpuWn0BUhVbe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
