On Sep 27, 2014, at 12:10 AM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > Barry Smith <[email protected]> writes: > >> Perhaps we erred in keeping the thread/task management/model code >> in PETSc as opposed to a small portable library? We should revisit >> this, but unfortunately cannot before next Wednesday :-), or can we >> :-) > > I was at the BLIS workshop yesterday and today discussing this with > Field and a guy at Q-Chem. I think an independent library is desirable > in the long term, but I don't think it's something that we can "win" in > the sense of having everyone adopt our library. So we'll always need to > interoperate with other systems.
Sure, but it will be easier to interoperate with other systems if it is a small, non-PETSc dependent beast. Barry
