On Oct 2, 2014, at 9:44 AM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > Barry Smith <[email protected]> writes: >> Yup. Jed is saying our histories should be terrible. > > ;-) > > There is a balancing act between "quality" of long-term history, utility > of near-term history, and development effort/opportunity for mistakes. > I personally think the sweet spot is to prefer not to rebase that which > has been merged to 'next’.
But this is just a fluke of our testing approach. If I had 15 machines I could test all myself and not put major broken things into next.
