Jose E. Roman writes: > El 23/12/2014, a las 20:38, Sean Farley escribió: > >> 4) Better coordination with dependent packages >> >> This item is hard to implement because it's out of the PETSc team's >> control. For example, packages like SLEPc depend on PETSc but don't have >> as good of a build system. SLEPc can't be built with a version of SLEPc >> already installed in the prefix. This is unnecessarily cumbersome for >> end-users. > > SLEPc issues a warning in this case, but does not prevent building. I have > removed the warning, since it is no longer necessary. Please report any > problems.
Ah, great! Thanks!
