Better, but still pretty loud. But this is not bad: 13:18 merge_em ~/Codes/epsi/XGC-1_examples/em_tearing$ mpirun -n 16 ../../XGC1_3/xgc-em |grep GAMG [0] PCGAMGProlongator_AGG(): New grid 4400 nodes [0] PCGAMGOptProlongator_AGG(): Smooth P0: max eigen=1.932173e+00 min=2.303153e-03 PC=jacobi [0] PCGAMGProlongator_AGG(): New grid 736 nodes [0] PCGAMGOptProlongator_AGG(): Smooth P0: max eigen=1.656603e+00 min=7.944341e-03 PC=jacobi [0] PCGAMGCreateLevel_GAMG(): Aggregate processors noop: new_size=16, neq(loc)=45 [0] PCGAMGProlongator_AGG(): New grid 80 nodes [0] PCGAMGOptProlongator_AGG(): Smooth P0: max eigen=1.683069e+00 min=6.834695e-02 PC=jacobi [0] PCGAMGCreateLevel_GAMG(): Number of equations (loc) 4 with simple aggregation [0] PCGAMGProlongator_AGG(): New grid 8 nodes [0] PCGAMGOptProlongator_AGG(): Smooth P0: max eigen=1.435867e+00 min=5.953441e-01 PC=jacobi [0] PCGAMGCreateLevel_GAMG(): Number of equations (loc) 4 with simple aggregation [0] PCSetUp_GAMG(): 5 levels, grid complexity = nan
I am missing output that I used to have with "verbose". Will see if I can add some of it back in. Thanks, Mark On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Tobin Isaac <[email protected]> wrote: > > Is `-info -info_exclude null,vec,mat` still too noisy? > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:10:35AM -0400, Mark Adams wrote: > > Now that 'verbose' is not in GAMG anymore, how can I get something > similar? > > that is not super noisy. > > Mark >
