I see, I forgot to pull. These were trivial changes: changed a variable name (that is a key word) and fixed a test that did not compile anymore so I did it directly on master.
Mark On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote: > Satish Balay <[email protected]> writes: > > I interpreted this merge as 'commits were made directly to master' - > > not a separate feature branch. > > It either means developing on 'master' (which has always been > discouraged) or doing a fast-forward merge of a topic branch (also > discouraged, but easier to do accidentally). >
