On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Mark Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > Humm, that is what I see (appended). I put a print in PETSC and see this > but I still have PETSC_COMM_SELF==0 in my fortran code. >
Is it possible that you do not have the right #include? Can you put exactly the same includes as ex61f Matt > Strange, the compile lines look close enough and the example ex61f sees a > good PETSC_COMM_SELF ... > > Mark > > (gdb) where > #0 PetscInitializeFortran () at > /Users/markadams/Codes/petsc/src/sys/objects/ftn-custom/zstartf.c:48 > #1 0x000000010027d985 in petscinitialize_ (filename=0x101eaab40 "", > ierr=0x7fff5fbff18c, len=80) at > /Users/markadams/Codes/petsc/src/sys/objects/ftn-custom/zstart.c:398 > #2 0x00000001000015b2 in tpetsc () at ex61f.F90:111 > #3 0x0000000100002a3d in main (argc=1, argv=0x7fff5fbff968 > "/Users/markadams/Codes/petsc/src/ksp/ksp/examples/tutorials/ex61f") at > ex61f.F90:60 > Current language: auto; currently minimal > (gdb) n > 50 if (PETSC_COMM_WORLD) c1 = MPI_Comm_c2f(PETSC_COMM_WORLD); > (gdb) p c1 > $1 = 0 > (gdb) n > 51 c2 = MPI_Comm_c2f(PETSC_COMM_SELF); > (gdb) p c1 > $2 = 1140850688 > (gdb) > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Satish Balay <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 1. Check if this is reproduceable with a petsc example for your build. >> >> 2. if you run in the debugger - and place a breakpoint in >> PetscInitializeFortran() - you should see the following trace. >> >> (gdb) where >> #0 PetscInitializeFortran () at >> /home/balay/petsc/src/sys/objects/ftn-custom/zstartf.c:48 >> #1 0x00007ffff66c396d in petscinitialize_ (filename=0x603640 >> <petscfortran1_> "", >> ierr=0x7fffffffe0bc, len=80) at >> /home/balay/petsc/src/sys/objects/ftn-custom/zstart.c:398 >> #2 0x0000000000401a42 in MAIN__ () at ex2f.F:102 >> (gdb) n >> 50 if (PETSC_COMM_WORLD) c1 = MPI_Comm_c2f(PETSC_COMM_WORLD); >> (gdb) p c1 >> $1 = 0 >> (gdb) n >> 51 c2 = MPI_Comm_c2f(PETSC_COMM_SELF); >> (gdb) p c1 >> $2 = 1140850688 >> >> >> Satish >> >> On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Mark Adams wrote: >> >> > I'm not sure where we are. My code works on Edison but fails on OSX. >> > Should I call PetscInitializeFortran? I do not have a C main. >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:14 PM, Barry Smith <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > PetscErrorCode PetscInitializeFortran(void) >> > > { >> > > MPI_Fint c1=0,c2=0; >> > > >> > > if (PETSC_COMM_WORLD) c1 = MPI_Comm_c2f(PETSC_COMM_WORLD); >> > > c2 = MPI_Comm_c2f(PETSC_COMM_SELF); >> > > petscsetcommonblock_(&c1,&c2); >> > > >> > > Note that this routine is called automatically by the Fortran >> > > petscinitialize function. >> > > >> > > Barry >> > > >> > > > On Mar 31, 2015, at 10:19 AM, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:13 AM, Mark Adams <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > No, I don't have a C main program (like the doc says). >> > > > >> > > > I can see COMM_WORLD set in the Fortran initialize wrapper, but >> where is >> > > COMM_SELF set? >> > > > >> > > > MAtt >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Matthew Knepley < >> [email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:44 AM, Mark Adams <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > > > I'm finding that my fortran code on OSX has PETSC_COMM_SELF == 0. >> > > > >> > > > I can not find where PETSC_COMM_SELF is created. >> > > > >> > > > Its set in PetscInitializeFortran(). Did you call that? >> > > > >> > > > Matt >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Mark >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >> > > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which >> their >> > > experiments lead. >> > > > -- Norbert Wiener >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >> > > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which >> their >> > > experiments lead. >> > > > -- Norbert Wiener >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener
