Remind me again how much the US tax payers spend on this machine each year.
> Begin forwarded message: > > From: Mark Adams <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [petsc-users] configure error on Titan with Intel > Date: May 12, 2015 at 11:12:55 AM CDT > To: Barry Smith <[email protected]> > Cc: Jed Brown <[email protected]>, petsc-users <[email protected]>, > "David Trebotich" <[email protected]>, "D'Azevedo, Ed F." <[email protected]> > > > > Notes: ./configure ran fine and detected -lhwloc in some standard system > install location under normal circumstances it couldn't just disappear for a > different example. > > > I configured in an interactive shell, so on a compute node. I tried to 'make > ex56' on a login node, as usual. So I am guessing that it would have worked > if I had made it a compute node. They have an inconstancy, I'm guessing. I > can try it all on a compute node .... > > Mark > > > > / > > > > On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Jed Brown <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Satish Balay <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> writes: > > > > > Also - Perhaps with intel compilers - the recommended blas is > > > something other than ACML? [like MKL?]. Something to check.. > > > > MKL (and anything built using the Intel compiler) has the "run slower on > > AMD" feature. For any given operation, ACML won't necessarily be > > faster, but at least it's not intentionally crippled. For most of what > > PETSc does, any such MKL/ACML difference is irrelevant. > > > > <configure.log><make.log> > >
