On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:59 AM, Satish Balay <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, Mark Adams wrote: > > > Let me summarize what I did (and showed the raw output in my original > > email) on a branch named master that is from a relatively new clone: > > > > > git pull origin master > > If you are on 'master' then you would just do a 'git pull' > > Are you sure you are on master? > Yes, I have the name in my curser, via Jed. > > > > git status --> 7 commits ahead of master > > > git commit ... // first commit of mine on this clone > > > git status --> 8 commits ahead of master > > > > So it looks like I have 7 mystery commits but I did not do them. How did > > they get there? What are they? I may have checkout maint in this clone, > > but I did not create any branches. > > To see what the local commits are - You would do: > > git fetch # this way origin/master is the latest > git log origin/master..master > or > gitk origin/master..master > > This looks like what I want. does this list the differences between origin/master and my master? Thanks, > We can't really guess - you would have to check what you have [and how > they got created..] > > Satish >
