changed in balay/fix-fortran-unused_variables and merged to next. Satish
On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Satish Balay wrote: > The change was done long ago.. I don't remember the reason [and it > wasn't documented in the commit message :(] > > https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/commits/aa4d2986619717de6f4da384f5fcafb39216e181 > > Perhaps we should revert it. > > I see a bunch of warnings with petsc fortran includes/examples. Will > fix and push.. > > Satish > > On Sun, 10 Apr 2016, Lisandro Dalcin wrote: > > > Why is this warning silenced? Why should we treat Fortran different > > than C/C++ regarding unused variables? Maybe some old gfortran > > confused local variables with dummy arguments? > > > > > > > >
