On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Dave May wrote: > On Friday, 24 June 2016, Satish Balay <[email protected]> wrote: > > > for (p=0; p<n_bbox_recv; p++) { > > printf("[rank %d]: box from %d : > > range[%+1.4e,%+1.4e]x[%+1.4e,%+1.4e]\n",rank,recv_bbox[p].owner_rank, > > > > > > recv_bbox[p].min[0],recv_bbox[p].max[0],recv_bbox[p].min[1],recv_bbox[p].max[1]); > > } > > > > > > Is this printf for debugging purposes - and perhaps should be removed? > > > Yeah - absolutely. > > I've been moving house(s) the last days and have been unable to clean up > all the annoying business like this. > Matt unexpectedly / abruptly merged my stuff without warning me :D > > I'll take care of it tonight.
This branch is merged into 'knepley/feature-plex-particle-example' - and some of the fixes are in this branch [bad fix workflow] - so you should first check here if some issue is fixes or not. Satish
