I see, thanks, On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 8:00 PM, Fande Kong <[email protected]> wrote:
> If you already have the overlapping subdomain, you do not have to set the > non-overlapping subdomain. If you already passed the overlapping > subdomain, you could not increase the overlap any more (however, we could > enable this very easily, but no many user cases, I think). > > > On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Mark Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > >> PetscErrorCode PCASMSetLocalSubdomains(PC pc,PetscInt n,IS is[],IS >> is_local[]) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> "is" is the overlapping subdomain, and "is_local" is the subdomain >>> without overlap. >>> >>> >> So if I have some overlapping subdomains (I don't) I would have to prune >> the IS to get some non-overlapping subdomain? Is this just for something >> internal or does it affect the semantics of the solver? And I assume I can >> still set the overlap and ASM will grow my subdomains accordingly? >> > >
