On 10/09/2016 11:48 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Antonio Trande <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > On 10/08/2016 11:50 PM, Satish Balay wrote: > >> > >> Do tests need internet by chance? > > > > Nope - but you might want to disable petscnagupgrade.py in > lib/petsc/conf/rules > > > How? > > > Change the action for the chk_upgrade target to 'true' >
I hope that it's right:
--- lib/petsc/conf/rules.orig 2016-07-24 19:18:20.000000000 +0200
+++ lib/petsc/conf/rules 2016-10-09 12:09:20.632035457 +0200
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
user=`ls -l ${INSTALL_LIB_DIR}/$$LIBNAME.${SL_LINKER_SUFFIX} | tr
-s ' ' | cut -d ' ' -f 3`; \
echo "Libraries were built by user $$user; please contact him/her
to have them rebuilt."; \
printf
"******************************************************"${PETSC_TEXT_NORMAL}"\n"
; \
- false; \
+ true; \
fi; \
fi; \
done
PAPI disabled.
Please, see the result of testing at the bottom of this log:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/petsc/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00462741-petsc/build.log.gz
--
---
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A
Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
