Yup, all these things need to be added.
> On Jan 17, 2017, at 8:25 PM, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Barry Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 17, 2017, at 8:13 PM, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 7:59 PM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Use ${DATAFILESPATH} like we do in all the legacy tests.
> >
> > Not working
>
> Why do you even listen to Jed, when you can listen to me. In this case the
> data files is in the PETSc share directory so you should use the ${PETSC_DIR}
> to point to it. Only files in the DATAFILESPATH directory should use
> $DATAFILESPATH
>
> Okay, that worked. I have one test converted.
>
> Gripes:
>
> 1) How do I run an individual test run?
>
> I use
>
> make -f gmakefile test searchin=plex
>
> to run plex tests, and I think
>
> make -f gmakefile test searchin=plex*ex1
>
> will work. However, how do I select ex1_2?
>
> 2) How do I replace the output which exists with the output of the current
> test run?
>
> This is amazingly useful after changes.
>
> 3) How do I give extra arguments with the make interface, rather than
> test_harness?
>
> Once I have all the functionality of my Python stuff, I will throw it away.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
> >
> > arch-c-exodus-master/tests/src/dm/impls/plex/examples/tests/runex1_gmsh_3.sh
> > -v
> > not ok dm_impls_plex_tests-ex1_gmsh_3
> > /PETSc3/petsc/petsc-dev/arch-c-exodus-master/bin/mpiexec -n 3 ../ex1
> > -filename /meshes/square.msh -interpolate 1 -dm_view > ex1_gmsh_3.tmp 2>
> > runex1_gmsh_3.err
> >
> > when I have
> >
> > test:
> > suffix: gmsh_3
> > nsize: 3
> > args: -filename ${DATAFILESPATH}/meshes/square.msh -interpolate 1
> > -dm_view
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > --
> > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
> > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
> > experiments lead.
> > -- Norbert Wiener
>
>
>
>
> --
> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments
> is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments
> lead.
> -- Norbert Wiener
