Barry Smith <[email protected]> writes: > Jed, > > Should this utilize the Get/Restore paradigm? > > If not should the name be different to prevent confusion? Currently we > have > > XXXCreate --> user needs to call a destroy > > XXXXGetYYY --> user needs to call a restore (but not always?) > > Could we introduce say > > XXXAccessYYY --> user does not call destroy or restore ?
Even VecGetArrayRead requires matching Restore. Light access is less safe and gives the library less opportunity for strictness to catch bugs.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
