Satish Balay <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, 3 Jun 2017, Jed Brown wrote: > >> We only need one FC now and the preferred executable name is mpifort >> (other variants like mpif90 are deprecated in both MPICH and Open MPI). >> I would just add this everywhere we currently have mpif90 but the code >> is already super convoluted and I'd rather simplify if possible. Does >> anyone use --with-gnu-compilers versus --with-vendor-compilers? Is it >> tested anywhere? > > Its not tested in the nightlybuilds - but I've seen these options (esp > with-gnu-compilers) used in configure.log sent by users. > > I'm not a fan of this interface - and won't miss it if removed. > [its a bit ambiguous when one does stuff like: '--with-gnu-compilers=1 > --with-mpi-dir=.'] > > A related issue is - how does one specify compatible compilers [for > c/c++/fortran]
--with-mpi-dir or specify each directly CC=cc FC=fort
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
