It's already there -- I fixed your pull request:
gabrielle 70: git blame gmakefile | grep NP
b95da926fad (Matthew Knepley 2017-06-14 17:33:01 -0600 103) ifdef NP
b95da926fad (Matthew Knepley 2017-06-14 17:33:01 -0600 104) TESTFLAGS
+= -n $(NP) # set number of processes
This is in master.
Scott
On 10/7/17 7:57 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 9:41 PM, Jed Brown <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Matthew Knepley <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> writes:
> This seems masochistic. I want to run a test with a different number
> of processes. So my best option is print out the options, cut &
paste
> that soewhere, alter it to what I want, and run? Why would we have
> EXTRA_OPTIONS?
I often want to run in a debugger with a command like
mpiexec -n 2 xterm -e gdb -ex 'b file.c:123' -ex r --args ./ex12
-some_options
which just seems painful any other way. But if you want to write that
by remembering a collection of variables through which to pass each
part, I won't stop you.
Good, don't stop me. Also don't prevent use from putting NPROCS into the
test harness.
Matt
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which
their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>
--
Tech-X Corporation [email protected]
5621 Arapahoe Ave, Suite A Phone: (720) 974-1841
Boulder, CO 80303 Fax: (303) 448-7756
