On 31 January 2018 at 20:37, Satish Balay <[email protected]> wrote: > sorry - fixed now. > > Thanks.
> [I thought I tested it before pushing - but apparently not! bad workflow] > > I know you've been discussing this recently, but we've found that lightweight branch testing (we've been using https://circleci.com/) has taken our success rate for full next testing from around 60% to over 90%. It would pick up errors like this one within a minute of pushing to a branch. Garth > Satish > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2018, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > The green bits here: > > > > https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/commits/b9693abc333a4cb54c29596de4de4a > 2160c61cc0 > > > > ain't proper Python. Breaks config. Not sure how this gets past your > > testing . . . . > > > > Garth > > > >
