On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 7:16 PM, Dener, Alp <ade...@anl.gov> wrote: > Sure thing! > > Matt, just to give you a bit of detail, the Monitor() calls to ASCII > viewers were changed to respect the tab levels for the parent objects > instead of manually pushing and popping tabs on the printouts. The code > also tries to preserve the existing tab levels of the viewer though — that > is, we first save the existing tab level, then indent monitor printouts > from the root (0 tab) using the object’s tab level, and then set the viewer > back to whatever tab level it was at before the monitor is called. So in > theory, it shouldn’t be changing the behavior of the viewer outside of the > monitor. It is entirely possible I introduced a bug somewhere and that’s > what I’m going to look for right now, but in the meantime please let me > know if there’s a use-case or a test I can use for debugging as well. >
The easiest thing to do is run all the SNES ex12 tests in next and look at the indentation errors. I am now pushing fixes for all other errors, so by the time you run there should be nothing else. Thanks, Matt > Thanks, > — > Alp Dener > > On April 3, 2018 at 6:11:12 PM, Smith, Barry F. (bsm...@mcs.anl.gov) > wrote: > > > Alp, > > Can you please take a look at this? > > Thanks > > Barry > > > > On Apr 3, 2018, at 4:46 PM, Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > The recent indentation fix (I think) has broken the FAS solver > indentation. > > > > Matt > > > > -- > > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their > experiments lead. > > -- Norbert Wiener > > > > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ > > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>