I have the following changes in balay/mpiuni-include/jed - mpi.mod -> mpiuni.mod
- remove -Iinclde/petsc/mpiuni If ok - they can be pulled into jed/mpiuni-include/maint Satish On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Satish Balay wrote: > On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, Jed Brown wrote: > > > Bitbucket keeps saying "Something went wrong while creating your pull > > request." but you can look at the branch > > > > https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/branch/jed/mpiuni-include/maint > > > > @balay Can we simply remove the MPIUNI includes from MPI.py or should we > > remove it later? > > Best to remove now - to check if there are issues? > > also Fix mpif.h usage code? > > There is also mpi.mod - that might need renaming [to comply with not > installing in /usr/include?] > > So rename to mpiuni.mod? [and rename mpi.h to mpiuni.h etc?] > > > Looks like this change is more of a 'master change'.. > > > > What --download packages are supported when using > > MPIUNI? I don't see any examples. > > Yeah - our tests are basic here. I don't remember if any externalpackages > compiled with mpiuni > > Satish >
