On Wed, 13 Jun 2018, Smith, Barry F. wrote: > > this way the example/user code uses: > > > > + call PetscFlush(6) > > > > [i.e with the 'call' statement explicitly listed in example/user code] > > This is fine (except for possibly one user who would just need to change > their code).
Well the test for flush()/flush_() was broken [I pushed a fix for this]. So its unlikely there is any user of this code. https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/commits/62b7aeb906df4258c2cd362570515e1ebe593d31 Satish
