Fande Kong <[email protected]> writes: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 12:58 PM, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 2:55 PM Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> PETSc had a Euclid interface until Barry removed it. >>> >>> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/commits/22b6d1ca80e4f79123036fb6afd7eb >>> 4463b3692a >>> >>> See also >>> >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg33196.html >> >> >> I would also add that it is considerate of Hypre to have such a terrible >> ILUT implementation >> because it reminds you that you should never ever ever use ILUT. >> > > So in theory, can we have a much better implementation? From my > understanding, algorithm itself is not suitable for parallel computation, > and it might not be a implementation problem only.
Performance is likely poor with any implementation, but bugs are bugs.
