> > > > Well, you could use _threshold to do more aggressive coarsening, but not > > for thinning out > > the interpolation. > > Increasing the threshold results in slower coarsening. > > Note that square_graph 10 is very unusual. > > Actually this is not crazy. For linear tets it is the way to go and recently I looked a ex56 (3D cube of Q1 elasticity) and this with a finite threshold worked best. I could swear that this was not the case in the past :/
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in FieldSplit Junchao Zhang
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in FieldSplit Fande Kong
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in FieldSplit Junchao Zhang
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in FieldS... Fande Kong
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in Fi... Matthew Knepley
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in Fi... Jed Brown
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in Fi... Matthew Knepley
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in Fi... Jed Brown
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in Fi... Pierre Jolivet
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in Fi... Mark Adams
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in Fi... Mark Adams
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in Fi... Mark Adams
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in FieldSplit Mark Adams
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in FieldSplit Mark Adams
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in FieldSplit Pierre Jolivet
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in FieldSplit Mark Adams
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in FieldS... Pierre Jolivet
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in Fi... Jed Brown
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in Fi... Mark Adams
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in Fi... Pierre Jolivet
- Re: [petsc-dev] Bad scaling of GAMG in Fi... Jed Brown