... except that it somehow passes this MAKEFLAGS= to configure, resulting in the confusing message ...
1. 12. 2018 v 17:33, Stefano Zampini <stefano.zamp...@gmail.com<mailto:stefano.zamp...@gmail.com>>: Make reconfigure is equivalent to rerun the configure script Il giorno Sab 1 Dic 2018, 18:09 Hapla Vaclav <vaclav.ha...@erdw.ethz.ch<mailto:vaclav.ha...@erdw.ethz.ch>> ha scritto: ... but this is apparently not caused by your merge. Is it just normal behavior of make reconfigure? I didn't know about this, I always call the reconfigure script directly. Vaclav > 1. 12. 2018 v 16:04, Hapla Vaclav > <vaclav.ha...@erdw.ethz.ch<mailto:vaclav.ha...@erdw.ethz.ch>>: > > Thanks, you're right. > > However, > > $ make reconfigure > =============================================================================== > Configuring PETSc to compile on your system > =============================================================================== > =============================================================================== > ***** WARNING: MAKEFLAGS (set to ) found in > environment variables - ignoring > use ./configure MAKEFLAGS=$MAKEFLAGS if you really > want to use that value ****** > =============================================================================== > > although I have no such variable set in my shell. > > Vaclav > >> 1. 12. 2018 v 15:36, Stefano Zampini >> <stefano.zamp...@gmail.com<mailto:stefano.zamp...@gmail.com>>: >> >> I have added a new package that gets built after petsc. You have to run >> >> make reconfigure >> >> Il giorno Sab 1 Dic 2018, 16:52 Hapla Vaclav >> <vaclav.ha...@erdw.ethz.ch<mailto:vaclav.ha...@erdw.ethz.ch>> ha scritto: >> Hi Stefano >> >> After pulling latest master, I get the following at the end of make output: >> make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'mfem-build', needed by >> 'all-gnumake-local'. Stop. >> make[1]: Leaving directory '/scratch/petsc-dev-1' >> Now to check if the libraries are working do: >> make PETSC_DIR=/scratch/petsc-dev-1 PETSC_ARCH=arch-linux-gcc check >> >> Do you think you could remove that line for non-mfem builds? I think it >> looks like an error for a user. >> >> Vaclav >
