Bump - is this question too complex or too stupid? :-) I'm now looking again on tests which are still failing in knepley/fix-plex-interpolate-sf-new.
There are several ones failing with Parallel partitioning of uninterpolated meshes not supported So I'll just remove them for now. One test (m_impls_plex_tests-ex18_2b) is failing just because of diff. I'll just check if the current output is correct and update the output file. But these three dm_impls_plex_tests-ex18_6_tet_nsize-4interpolate-parallel_faces-2,2,2 dm_impls_plex_tests-ex18_6_tet_nsize-4interpolate-parallel_faces-1,3,5 dm_impls_plex_tests-ex18_6_tet_nsize-4interpolate-parallel_faces-3,4,7 fail with point SF contains X but not Y from its cone Can it also be a problem of partitioning, and not interpolation? So should we just for now disable ctetgen without interpolation and remove those tests? If it is the case, knepley/fix-plex-interpolate-sf-new should be merged soon, just after removing the failing tests. Thanks Vaclav On 31 Jan 2019, at 15:33, Hapla Vaclav <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Matt, your commit https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/commits/ffbd61634109cd55a4e1889a4f100c5a1bdbfef1 says Parallel partitioning of uninterpolated meshes not supported. So should I now take it as a not-yet-implemented feature? Does it really concern only this order of operations? 1) load sequentially 2) distribute 3) redistribute in parallel 4) interpolate in parallel So the following three use cases I) 1) load sequentially 2) interpolate sequentially 3) distribute 4) redistribute in parallel II) 1) load sequntially 2) distribute 3) interpolate in parallel 4) redistribute in parallel III) 1) load in parallel 2) interpolate in parallel 3) redistribute in parallel can still be considered supported in general? I mean not regarding the issues with the SF which still seem to affect parallel interpolation (https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/branch/knepley/fix-plex-interpolate-sf). BTW I now rebased this branch onto master as <https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/branch/knepley/fix-plex-interpolate-sf-new> https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc/branch/knepley/fix-plex-interpolate-sf-new and it now needs to take that not-yet-implemented feature into account - I will update it and remind to me what cases are still failing. Thanks in advance for clarification! Vaclav
