> On Jun 10, 2019, at 4:33 PM, Balay, Satish <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> now configure needs to know and support full spack build and query all the 
> dependency info from spack..

  We could have some test cases where PETSc is also built by spack, which 
presumably works and would also test petsc-spack

> 
> For now - I'll try out a simpler model [i.e manually rebuild as needed]

  Not for long you don't, we have better things to do with your time.

> 
> Satish
> 
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019, Smith, Barry F. via petsc-dev wrote:
> 
>>  That seems ok. We could also overload --download-mpich=spack for anal 
>> people like me :-)
>> 
>>  Somehow we also need to let configure know where the spack configuration 
>> is. 
>> 
>>> On Jun 10, 2019, at 4:21 PM, Jed Brown <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> "Smith, Barry F." <[email protected]> writes:
>>> 
>>>> Yes, spack could be used to do this. I guess essentially Buildsystem would 
>>>> issues commands to spack on each "prebuilt" package each time it runs in 
>>>> test mode (using the URL in the package file?)  and after the first time 
>>>> spack would ignore the commands since it already had the version ready. I 
>>>> could use this on my machine also. 
>>>> 
>>>> Barry
>>>> 
>>>> --spack-mpich etc ?
>>> 
>>> Would --with-mpich=spack be confusing?
>> 
> 

Reply via email to