Satish Balay <[email protected]> writes: >> +1 for the for-loop declarations. >> >> No more need to police the use of // C++-style comments? > > I think the objection was more about the code style. Mixing both types of > comments does not look good.
I don't have a problem with // for one-line comments and /* */ for multi-line. This would also be easy to batch replace across the whole (private) code base -- strictly /* */ in public headers. I'm also fine with keeping /* */ everywhere.
