Barry Smith <[email protected]> writes: > We should be more clever than checking just examples but also check source > code. If, for example, only KSP is changed then tests could skip the > sys/vec/mat levels saving time. > > If we did this in the pipeline they could be significantly faster; all the > time saved not testing sys to mat for Matt's changes :-) > > Is there a fallacy here?
I think we could pretty readily do this at the granularity of package. Significantly harder (would need to interface with a coverage tool) to do it at finer granularity. What fraction of our testing time is currently at petscmat and below?
