On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:34 PM Barry Smith <bsm...@petsc.dev> wrote:
> > A major problem with writing a completely new version of a large code > base is that one has to start with nothing and slowly build up to > everything, which can take years. Years in which you need to continue to > maintain the old version, people want to continue to add functionality to > the old version, and people want to continue to use the old version because > the new version doesn't have "the functionality the user needs" ready yet. > > Is there an approach where we can have a new PETSc API/language/paradigm > but start with a very thin layer on the current API so it just works from > day one? > > - to this would seem to require if PETSc future is not in C, there has > to be a very, very easy way and low error-prone way to wrap PETSc current > to be called from the new language. For example, how petsc4py wraps seems > too manual and too error-prone. C++ can easily and low-error prone call C, > any other viable candidates? > > This looked like the most promising thing about Zig. We could develop the new modules alongside the existing C, and throw them away if we decide it is not worth it. Matt -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>
