Karl, Thanks for the effort. I feel we should have had less projects and instead gave a good introduction to one or two. Lessons for next year.
--Junchao Zhang On Wed, Feb 22, 2023 at 10:48 PM Karl Rupp <r...@iue.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > Dear all, > > unfortunately our application for the Google Summer of Code 2023 got > rejected. I haven't received any feedback on the reasons yet; however, > looking at our GSoC ideas list I can see that we haven't done a good > enough job to describe our GSoC-projects. > > Well, we can take this as input for a better application next year :-) > > Best regards, > Karli > > > On 2/7/23 18:37, Karl Rupp wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > thanks for all the input and help. Our application has been submitted, > > let's keep our fingers crossed. > > > > Also, this is a friendly reminder to fill out the details on the > > GSoC-topics: > > https://gitlab.com/petsc/petsc/-/issues/?search=GSoC > > Part of the evaluation is whether our ideas are properly communicated. > :-) > > > > Thanks and best regards, > > Karli > > > > > > > > On 2/6/23 20:24, Karl Rupp wrote: > >> Hello all, > >> > >> thanks for proposing projects. I've created the suggestions so far as > >> 'issues' in the issue tracker on Gitlab, prefixed by 'GSoC:'. Please > >> add a better description to your suggestions so that applicants get a > >> better idea of what that project is all about and how to get started. > :-) > >> > >> Also, Satish, Junchao, Jed, and Matt should have received invitations > >> to join the PETSc org for GSoC 2023. Please join today, as we need to > >> apply by tomorrow (Tuesday) 18:00 UTC. > >> > >> I've got one question regarding payment processing; since that is a > >> bit sensitive, I'll send it to the private list petsc-maint. > >> > >> Thanks and best regards, > >> Karli > >> > >> > >> > >> On 2/4/23 20:46, Matthew Knepley wrote: > >>> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 6:28 PM Jed Brown <j...@jedbrown.org > >>> <mailto:j...@jedbrown.org>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Thanks for proposing this. Some ideas: > >>> > >>> * DMPlex+libCEED automation > >>> * Pipelined Krylov methods using Rust async > >>> * Differentiable programming using Enzyme with PETSc > >>> > >>> > >>> I like all those. > >>> > >>> Matt > >>> > >>> Karl Rupp <r...@iue.tuwien.ac.at <mailto:r...@iue.tuwien.ac.at>> > >>> writes: > >>> > >>> > Dear PETSc developers, > >>> > > >>> > in order to attract students to PETSc development, I'm thinking > >>> about a > >>> > PETSc application for Google Summer of Code (GSoC) 2023: > >>> > https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/programs/2023 > >>> <https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/programs/2023> > >>> > > >>> > The org application deadline is February 7, i.e. in 4 days. This > >>> > application is - roughly speaking - a form with a state of > intent > >>> and a > >>> > justification why the project is a good fit for GSoC. I've done > >>> this in > >>> > the past (~2010-12) and can do the paperwork again this year. > >>> > > >>> > What is required: > >>> > - PETSc developers, who are willing to act as mentors > >>> throughout the > >>> > program. > >>> > - A few good project ideas (e.g. MATDENSE for GPUs) for > >>> > contributors/students to work on > >>> > > >>> > It used to be that new organizations will get at most 2 > >>> contributor > >>> > slots assigned. That's fair, because one must not > >>> underestimate the > >>> > effort that goes into mentoring. > >>> > > >>> > Thoughts? Shall we apply (yes/no)? If yes, are you willing to be > >>> mentor? > >>> > The more mentors, the better; it underlines the importance of > the > >>> > project and indicates that contributors will find a good > >>> environment. > >>> > > >>> > Thanks and best regards, > >>> > Karli > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > >>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which > >>> their experiments lead. > >>> -- Norbert Wiener > >>> > >>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ > >>> <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/> >