Sorry I don't really understand. So is there any difference in optimization between the 2 libraries? Or is it just extensive additional "assert type"?
Thank you. On 1/30/07, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > > PETSc also does extensive additional "assert type" testing of input > arguments > to functions etc in the debug version. > > Barry > > > On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Matthew Knepley wrote: > > > On 1/29/07, Ben Tay <zonexo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > May I know what's the difference between the optimized and debugging > > > version? > > > > > > Have the optimization flags such as -O3 been used in the compilcation > of > > > the libraries for the optimized one? Whereas for the debugging > version, > > > there is no optimization by the compiler? > > > > > > > It is just the difference in compiler flags. You would have to look at > the > > compiler documentation. > > > > If my program works fine in the debugging version, does it mean that I > will > > > not get errors in the optimized version? > > > > > > > Most likely. > > > > Matt > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20070130/5450f1a0/attachment.htm>
